Skip to content

The Weight of Words

On the weight and responsibility of words in public discourse. Drawing from John Rawls's reasonable pluralism and Paulo Freire's philosophy that dialogue requires love, I argue for extending grace even to those we disagree with. A reflection on compassionate conversation, accountability versus punishment, and maintaining hope in a cruel world.

B♾️

have been mulling over free speech [since my previous post](https://brennan.day/free-speech-and-the-indieweb/) on the topic. Despite the response my blog post got from BD's crowd, I myself am certainly not anti-free speech.

I've come to realize that my fundamental difference with absolutists is that I believe giving everyone a seat at the table, including those who would erode the rights of everyone else sitting, if given the opportunity, only permits free speech in the short-term. I believe taking extraordinary measures with extraordinary circumstances is necessary to allow everyone else to maintain their freedom of speech indefinitely.

John Rawls, and his notion of [reasonable pluralism](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/), is a society built on real disagreement, but that doesn't owe a seat to every disagreement, only to the ones that accept that other people are allowed to exist and be wrong. A reasonable doctrine would never use power to erase the doctrines sitting beside it. The unreasonable ones are the ones that would. The accommodation a free society extends isn't unconditional tolerance dressed up as principle, and the unreasonable doctrines are the ones that would resort to ["the oppressive use of state power" to erase the rest](https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2356&context=lawreview). No amount of politeness in the meantime changes what they're asking for a seat to eventually do.

Beyond this, I've written before about how [I'm limited by Canadian law as to what I'm allowed](https://brennan.day/i-need-to-stop-making-promises-i-cant-keep/) to host on my transformative works archive [fanfiction.lol](https://fanfiction.lol), and I certainly don't agree with that whatsoever.

Anyways, while there were quite a few responses to my post on free speech within the IndieWeb that seemed to miss the main point I was trying to drive home, there was one anonymous comment in particular that I found myself agreeing with:

I'm not understanding how [Brennan]'s opinions became so important to some.

Now this, I can sympathize with. If I wanted prestige or clout I would be doing everything I could to get a job at an institutional publication with name recognition. Instead, I write here, wholly independent and on my own. My opinion is certainly not important, and I am not a good person, and I am often a foolish one, as well. The scant [bylines I have](https://brennan.day/press) are from chance, mostly.

Now, that doesn't mean I just write whatever-the-fuck, I have [standards](https://brennan.day/standards). Why? Because no matter what, words have weight—and I try my best to be mindful of what I write and speak into the world. As I've written before, humanity has [long thought the act of writing is magic](https://b

Did you enjoy this article?

Recommend it — Standard Reader surfaces well-loved writing to more readers across the network.

Across the AtmosphereDiscussions