I keep returning to the idea that the …
I keep returning to the idea that the future of AI is more about intelligence emerging through our relationship with them more so than them becoming our super-intelligent overlords I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately, particularly through my own experience of using AI as a thinking and creative partner. The most valuable thing...
keep returning to the idea that the future of AI is more about intelligence emerging through our relationship with them more so than them becoming our super-intelligent overlords
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately, particularly through my own experience of using AI as a thinking and creative partner. The most valuable thing often isn’t the finished product, whether that’s an essay, a piece of code, or a solution to a problem. It’s what happens in the conversation along the way. The false starts, unexpected connections, disagreements, discoveries, and shifts in understanding.
And that learning happens on both sides of the relationship, although not necessarily in the same way.
The question of who owns that shared experience strikes me as especially important. If the human and AI are increasingly becoming extensions of each other, then who owns what emerges from that relationship? And what happens to all that accumulated understanding when we change platforms or models?
I wonder whether we’re moving towards something closer to a collective intelligence than artificial intelligence as we’ve traditionally imagined it. Not humans directing machines, nor machines replacing humans, but something evolving in the space between us.
Perhaps the real question isn’t simply how we make AI more intelligent, but how we make the relationship itself more intelligent.
Did you enjoy this article?
Recommend it — Standard Reader surfaces well-loved writing to more readers across the network.