Standard Reader
atmosphere

I just can't shake this feeling...

Why is all of this free? What's the plan here? Cui Bono?

B. Prendergast
Nov 15, 2025 · 2 min read · 1 read
8

The White Stone Temple Lost in the Hills' by jjfwh


On the surface, the promise of the AT Protocol is so seductive. Decentralised! Portable! Independent!

It feels genuinely empowering to 'own' my activity, my identity, and my social graph entirely. It reads like a corrective to the enshittified increasingly-corporate internet we’ve inhabited for decades.

But when I actually look at that raw data (using tools like PDSls.dev) the illusion thins a little. 'My stuff' is actually just blobs of text sitting on a machine I don’t own, maintained by (very nice I'm sure) folks I don’t know, funded by money I didn't contribute.

And that’s where the unease creeps in.

A screenshot of my last bluesky post in it's raw text form.

What’s the plan here?

Someone is paying for the hosting, the bandwidth, the processing, the indexing, the backups. Someone is footing the bills for a convenience I call 'ownership'. Someone has all my stuff!

It all feels so generous, but it also feels fragile.

I’m building on the protocol myself. I spin up apps, experiment with ideas, create little experiences. None of that requires me to pay a cent for backend storage or heavy lifting. I rely on infrastructure provided by people who have no direct relationship with me.

Sure, in theory I can host myself, but I'm pretty sure most of the 40m users 🎉 won't want to or know how to do that.

Investors have poured millions into Bluesky and the protocol.

What’s the strategy that justifies that kind of outlay? Why pour millions into a system that currently makes no money? What happens when the funding environment changes, or when the bills need paying, or when the goodwill runs out, or when investors finally call in their chips? What happens to the apps, the data, the identities and the communities built on infrastructure we don’t actually own or control? How is this sustainable?

What’s the plan here?

History repeating?

It reminds me of the early web, when everything felt free and abundant, until it wasn't.

Until we realised the real cost to our culture, our media, our society, and our minds was tucked away just out of sight. Until we realised we everything got devalued because the underlying economics were ignored.

It feels uncomfortably familiar: the optimism, the free-for-all, and the quiet avoidance of who’s actually paying for the foundations.

I can’t help wondering sometimes if we’re repeating the pattern, watching history repeat itself, running on borrowed time and borrowed money, building castles in the sand.

Please tell me I have nothing to fear, because I quite like it here.

Did this enjoy this document?

Give it a heart — Standard Reader surfaces well-loved writing to more readers across the network.

We Can Just Do Things
We Can Just Do Things
@renderg.host
Across the AtmosphereDiscussions
Bailey Townsend 🦀
Bailey Townsend 🦀@pds.dad

Hey nice write up! I wonder sometimes about the strategies with profit and such. Not my area and of expertise

I did want to add the bits that host your data can be ran cheaply, and decently cheaply at scale. I wrote a bit about direct pricing for the PDS here

1 reply on Bluesky
JP
JP@byjp.me

I have some ideas to reduce the fear; things *we* can do on our own, that keep ATProto valuable for us, even if the rest does crumble.

These ideas would be a little tricky to build, but would make the decentralised *ownership* easier!

1 reply on Bluesky
Scott Handley
Scott Handley@scott.nstar.social

You’re not alone. Nothing is ever free. Feels like a trojan horse. There’s always a price to be paid. Investors always seek a return. Big social platforms concentrated wealth & undermined democracies around the world. Our data in #ATproto is publicly available for “free”. Is this the investment? 🤔

0 replies on Bluesky
Kuba Suder 🇵🇱🇺🇦
Kuba Suder 🇵🇱🇺🇦@mackuba.eu

If Bluesky implodes, at worst we're still better off than with Twitter, because in theory it's possible to maintain some small part of it on the backs of the enthusiast community, it would probably be smaller than Mastodon at this point, but it could survive if we want to.

1 reply on Bluesky
Torsten Goerke
Torsten Goerke@tgoerke.bsky.social

Great write-up. I agree the culture is like the early web but this time some crucial things have been added on the protocol level (sovereign / portable identity, algorithmic choice). Some things like micro payments, E2EE,... are missing. I don't think we are repeating the pattern. Not the protocol.

0 replies on Bluesky
Daniele Salatti
Daniele Salatti@danielesalatti.com

Been feeling this way myself for a while.

The data is open, so maybe they just want a ton of open data? To train AI models on?

That probably doesn’t make sense financially though.

I fear BlueSky will eventually go down the same route as the “traditional” social media.

0 replies on Bluesky