notes
rough notes from standard music lexicon meeting
Apr 9, 20263 min read3 reads
common lexicon
- what should we get from a common lexicon
- reuse metadata
- distributor messes up something → one place to fix
metadata shape
- western pop music, not classical metadata
- classical music has more metadata
- ID3 tags → extra fields
scope
- indexing all audio is very different from enforcing royalties downstream
catalogue server / infrastructure
- tom: centralized (stripe) for simplicity
- catalogue server hosts keys, publishes public keys
- permissioned data should solve this ^
- bandcamp royalties → self-report to PRO?
expressiveness vs portability
- expressiveness vs portability
- what is the minimal set of common fields??
- alex: perf is important!! (streaming latency, not performance royalties)
- "catalogue.xyz" could be the owner of a permissioned space that is a purpose-built PDS to stream audio at high perf
- catalogue → where you upload, licensing, encrypt etc
DRM analogue
- apple fairplay → content decryption module
- API → decrypted data
interlude
- all trying to do the same thing → our lifetime
listener / spotify
- alex: listener is the artist too (curation angle — playlist curators as artists; unclear if extends to remixing)
- spotify → licensing → legal
moderation
- moderation → hosting vs indexing → takedowns etc
- ToS: use in models, generative use, royalties
- fingerprinting → content ID
royalties / publishing
- performing royalty collection → complicates things
- ASCAP?
- ISRC codes → ??
- 3rd party publisher, BMI? as independent artist, writing and recording
- publishing might be separate in some cases
alex: 2 modes
- songwriter → managed by agency who manages relations
- band → defer to platforms distributions (symphonic → labelworks)
@emotionengine.rip
- manage legal stuff in the same place, independent of platform
Did you enjoy this article?
Recommend it — Standard Reader surfaces well-loved writing to more readers across the network.